Website Testing Services for Websites, Web Apps and Mobile Apps

Website testing checks that a site or app does what it should on real browsers and devices, for real users, before and after changes. It is separate because developers test what they built to work; a tester tries to make it fail. Independent testing catches the broken form, slow page or inaccessible button that a build team walks past.

Yes. Most testing enquiries are for sites and apps we didn't build: a new site before launch, an app before store submission, or a live site after a redesign. We need access to a test environment or the live site, any existing specification, and a contact who can answer "is this meant to happen?".

Both. Simulators are useful for quick checks across many screen sizes, but touch targets, keyboards, cameras, notifications and slow connections only behave truthfully on real hardware. We test on a set of physical iPhones and Android devices plus current Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Edge.

Regression testing re-runs checks on features that already worked, after something changes, to confirm nothing broke. It matters most after plugin, framework or operating-system updates. Patchstack logged 11,334 WordPress vulnerabilities in 2025, so updating promptly is essential, but each update can alter behaviour, and regression testing is how you find out before customers do.

Both, for different jobs. Automated scripts (we use Selenium WebDriver ) repeat the same checks quickly after every change, ideal for forms, logins and checkouts. Manual testing finds what scripts can't: confusing wording, awkward flows, layout problems on an unusual screen. A typical pass combines a scripted core with exploratory manual testing.

Accessibility testing checks a website or app against WCAG 2.2, the international standard, so people using screen readers, keyboards, magnification or voice control can use it. In the UK the Equality Act applies, and from 28 June 2025 any business selling online to EU consumers also falls under the European Accessibility Act. Most untested sites fail.

Yes. Apple reviewed 7.8 million submissions in 2024 and rejected 24.9%; 64% of those rejections were completeness and performance problems under Guideline 2 (Apple, 2024). Our pre-submission check covers crashes, placeholder content, broken links, login demo accounts, privacy labels and metadata, which is exactly where most avoidable rejections happen.

A single-site functional and device pass typically takes two to five working days; a full pass including accessibility, performance and a written report takes one to two weeks, depending on page count and features . Retesting after fixes is usually a day. We agree the scope and dates before starting.

A written test report listing every issue found, with severity, steps to reproduce, screenshots or screen recordings, and the device or browser affected. Accessibility findings reference the WCAG 2.2 criterion failed. You can hand it directly to your developer, and we retest once fixes are made and confirm what was resolved.

We run security checks as part of testing: authentication, permissions, form input handling, exposed files and configuration, and common vulnerability scans. A full penetration test, where a specialist actively attempts to break in, is a separate engagement . We'll tell you which you need.